And the 777 is said to be really realistic and looks better with each release (but too complex to me). The Cessna 337 is really nice, also the DR400 and the Cap10, and the new Extra 500 is looking gorgeous. But that is just details, and it should only get better with future releases.Īnd as for planes, there are some very amazing ones. Also the contours of cities, forests, the path of rivers, coastlines, they often have too little resolution for my taste.
The resolution of the mesh (that is, the information about elevation) is not very high, so mountains sometimes look like pyramids. This is miles ahead of other sims.įG's main problem, in my opinion, is with its scenery. And the ALS system is gorgeous, the sky looks better than any other sim with dynamic change of colours according to haze, sun position, weather, etc.
I can only fly in clear days on my computer.). As much as I like to fly X-Plane 10 as well, it is amazing to be able to fly with tons of clouds in the sky or even in a complete overcast and rainy day without having a drop in performance (try that with X-Plane clouds. For instance, the weather engine (in advanced mode) takes into consideration the terrain layout when generating a weather pattern, so mountains, sea, etc., influence the weather. In my view, FlightGear had some huge leaps in quality in the past year or so, it has some really stunning features. I believe that is the 777, but I may be mistaken (I rarely fly large jets).
0 kommentar(er)
